Hüttemann, A. and A.C. Love (2011) “Aspects of reductive explanation in biological science: intrinsicality, fundamentality, and temporality”, British Journal for Philosophy of Science 62:519–549.
Resources
Aspects of reductive explanation in biological science: intrinsicality, fundamentality, and temporality
The Pluralist Stance
Kellert, S., H. Longino, and C.K. Waters (2006) “The Pluralist Stance”, in Scientific Pluralism, Volume XIX of the Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, edited by S. Kellert, H. Longino and C.K. Waters, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 7–29.
Introduction: Pursuing a Naturalist Metaphysics
Kincaid, H. (2014) Introduction: Pursuing a Naturalist Metaphysics. In Scientific Metaphysics, D. Ross, J. Ladyman and H. Kincaid (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–26.
Gene: Current Usages
Kitcher, P.S. (1992) "Gene: Current Usages", in E. Keller and E. Lloyd (eds.), Keywords in Evolutionary Biology, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 128–131.
Structural Realism
Ladyman, J. (2014) "Structural Realism", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.)
Every Thing Must Go
Ladyman, J. and D. Ross (2007) Every Thing Must Go, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society
Latour, B. (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
A Confutation of Convergent Realism
Laudan, L. (1981) "A Confutation of Convergent Realism", Philosophy of Science, 48: 19–48.
Integrating data to acquire new knowledge: Three modes of integration in plant science
Leonelli, S. (2013) "Integrating data to acquire new knowledge: Three modes of integration in plant science", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 44(4): 503-514
Explaining evolutionary innovation and novelty: criteria of adequacy and multidisciplinary prerequisites
Love, A.C. (2008) “Explaining evolutionary innovation and novelty: criteria of adequacy and multidisciplinary prerequisites”, Philosophy of Science 75:874–886.
Comparing part-whole explanations in biology and physics
Love, A.C. and A. Hüttemann (2011) “Comparing part-whole explanations in biology and physics”, in D. Dieks, W.J. Gonzalez, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel, and M. Weber (eds), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Berlin: Springer, 183–202.
Thinking About Mechanisms
Machamer, P., L. Darden, and C.F. Craver (2000) “Thinking About Mechanisms”, Philosophy of Science, 67: 1–25.
Second Philosophy
Maddy, P. (2007) Second Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Metaphysics Within Physics
Maudlin, T. (2007) The Metaphysics Within Physics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism
Mitchell, S. (2003) Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy
Mitchell, S. (2009) Unsimple Truths: Science, Complexity, and Policy, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
What Genes Can’t Do
Moss, L. (2004) What Genes Can’t Do, Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, MIT Press.
Reply to Sober and Waters
Okasha, S. (2011) “Reply to Sober and Waters” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(1), pp. 241-8.
Temporal Experience
Paul, L.A. (2010) “Temporal Experience”, Journal of Philosophy, 107(7): 333–359.
The Concept of the Gene: Short History and Present Status
Portin, P. (1993) "The Concept of the Gene: Short History and Present Status", The Quarterly Review of Biology, 68: 173-223.